Thursday, March 22, 2012
"THEY DO NOT SEE YOU" vs "VISIBLE TOO LATE"
3/22/12
Called the United States Supreme Court on 3/21/12 and spoke to someone in the clerk of court office;
the person [young member of "We the People" of the United States where I aske question[s] on filing and submitting document[s]; they started asking me some questions; response was "didn't know". One of the question[s] that they asked was if I was on death row after I asked if they could tell me where to put information about the fact that if the UInited States Supreme Court doesn't address issue[s] that it may be possible that I may not be here by this time next year, etc.; told them that I "didn't know"; then they asked well are you behind bar[s]; are you in confinement and told then; there are all kind[s] of confinement; depend[s] on who you ask; till finanlly they got the picture and just tried to answer the question[s] as best they could.
Called the United States Supreme Court on 3/21/12 and spoke to someone in the clerk of court office;
the person [young member of "We the People" of the United States where I aske question[s] on filing and submitting document[s]; they started asking me some questions; response was "didn't know". One of the question[s] that they asked was if I was on death row after I asked if they could tell me where to put information about the fact that if the UInited States Supreme Court doesn't address issue[s] that it may be possible that I may not be here by this time next year, etc.; told them that I "didn't know"; then they asked well are you behind bar[s]; are you in confinement and told then; there are all kind[s] of confinement; depend[s] on who you ask; till finanlly they got the picture and just tried to answer the question[s] as best they could.
In the Winston-Salem Journal are two articles relating to the teenage boy Trayvon Martin who shot by a hispanic male [that looked white]. The title of the articles where "Boy's Shooter Vigilant or VIGILANTE"
and "Teens Death raises painful, pressing questions".
"Leonard Pitts column: Teen's death raises painful, pressing questions" article started off with:
"They do not see you"; and ended with statement that Trayvon Martin was "Visible too late."
And after petitioning the United States Court[s]; have tried to submit and will keep trying to submit a petition to the United States Supreme Court that after over twenty five plus years of documented harassment, psychological abuse, intimidation [from undue influence]; and threats of confinement for working from last employer [S-m's C--b] that the Lower Court[s] actions are inline with all of the twenty five plus years of
harassment, intimidation, so that those who are to intervene in abuse do not see me; and cannot see me because of the Lower Court[s] interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment that the person in the Fourteenth Amendment is seen as less than the person in "We the People" of the United States which allow the person of the Fourteenth Amendment to be ignored [or for people to be rewarded[hispanic] for ignoring or abusing of the person in/of the Fourteenth Amendment. Trayvon Martin was a person in/of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Lot of illegal hispanics being allowed to live and thrive in the United States; but African American[s] are being hindered from doing the same unless they do something illegal/immoral.New trend is that hispanic[s] are some of the people who are paid to commit ethnic intimidation, forced assismilation, cultural transformation and cultural genocide of the person in/of the Fourteenth Amendment.;Technically for all of those who claim that the head person of the country is black; his birth mother was a member of "We the People" of the United States and as such her privileges were transfered.The Fourteenth Amendment person born from two Fourteenth Amendment parent[s] unless they sell their heritiage [by participating in ethnic intimidation, etc.] are the recipients of ethnic intimidation, etc..
And after petitioning the United States Court[s]; have tried to submit and will keep trying to submit a petition to the United States Supreme Court that after over twenty five plus years of documented harassment, psychological abuse, intimidation [from undue influence]; and threats of confinement for working from last employer [S-m's C--b] that the Lower Court[s] actions are inline with all of the twenty five plus years of
harassment, intimidation, so that those who are to intervene in abuse do not see me; and cannot see me because of the Lower Court[s] interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment that the person in the Fourteenth Amendment is seen as less than the person in "We the People" of the United States which allow the person of the Fourteenth Amendment to be ignored [or for people to be rewarded[hispanic] for ignoring or abusing of the person in/of the Fourteenth Amendment. Trayvon Martin was a person in/of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Lot of illegal hispanics being allowed to live and thrive in the United States; but African American[s] are being hindered from doing the same unless they do something illegal/immoral.New trend is that hispanic[s] are some of the people who are paid to commit ethnic intimidation, forced assismilation, cultural transformation and cultural genocide of the person in/of the Fourteenth Amendment.;Technically for all of those who claim that the head person of the country is black; his birth mother was a member of "We the People" of the United States and as such her privileges were transfered.The Fourteenth Amendment person born from two Fourteenth Amendment parent[s] unless they sell their heritiage [by participating in ethnic intimidation, etc.] are the recipients of ethnic intimidation, etc..
Even after having "plogged" [pen and paper] for over twenty years and "blogged" for over six years about the harassment, intimidation,. etc.document[s] filed in Untied States Court[s], still dealing with the harassment and intimidation and have written/email the proper authorities; but no response [They do not see you]; which is the reason why have tried to put issue before the United States Supreme Court before [Visible too late] for me, more family or friends, etc.."They do not see you" vs "Visible too late". Submittted petition to the United States Supreme Court that local community/Lower Court[s] "They do not see Socialpeacest" vs "Socialpeacest bing "Visible too late".
"Ralph Ellison described that phenomenon in a milestone novel that begins as follows: "I am an invisible man. No, I am not a spook like those who haunted Edgar Allan Poe. Nor am I one of your Hollywood-movie ectoplasms. I am a man of substance, of flesh and bone, fiber and liquids — and I might even be said to possess a mind. I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me.""
In my case; the Respondent[s] attorney[s] said that enough fact[s] were not pleaded; Black[s] law dictionary
[Reason why one of the main dictionary[s] is called [BLACKS]Socialpeacest; There is no such thing as enough which is reference to "provokation"; in other words the only way that any situation is concidered as
worthy is if the people who bring the issue know how to provoke those who have the remedy to act; for Fourteenth Amendment people that ususally means violence in the street[s] or publicity. Heard people on
the radio talking about No more, we not going to take it no more; lie; all it is a recyceled harassment, and
abuse over and over; first abuse was done strictly by "We the People" of the United States; society said stop; that aint right; then "We the people" of the United States started paying the Fourteenth Amendment person to do themselves in [drugs]; then society said that aint right; now the next move is to pay illegal hispanics to abuse the Fourteenth Amendment person [illegals were not born in the United States and are not Fourtheenth Amendment person]; after the hispanics abuse the Fourteenth Amendment person; then the people who knocked down the World Trade Center Tower[s] will be paid to abuse the Fourteeth Amendment person; [part of the reason for the whole September 11, 2001; there had to be a visable acceptable manner
to get negative element[s] from overseas into the United States Culture.
All action[s] are okayed through the United States Constitution that gives "We the People" of the United States inalienable rights to work, have relationships, protect themselves, promote their general welfare[work not food stamps]; which were right[s] that were not given to the person in the Fourteenth Amendment. Solution is to include all Fourteenth Amendment person in having inaleinable rights in the Preamble of the United States Constitution given to "We the People" of the United States. Unitil that is done; African Americans will keep going through the same thing over and over; because the person in "We the People" of the United States can always choose to use the interpretation [which the United States Supreme Court has ruled illegal] that the person in the Fourteenth Amendment is less before the law [Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)] and until the United States Supreme Court puts in writing in the United States Constitution that an African American whose parents are an African American male and female has the same inalienable rights as "We the People" of the United States; Blacks will keep saying the same old thing; "No
more"; do you ever hear of any other race of people that is always attacked; abused, etc.. No!; just African
American[s]; hispanic[s] were brought in to water down the situation as a form of diversion [African Americans familes are being forced to accept hispanics/relationship[s] or have their family member[s] attacked [technical term is ethnic -cleansing][removal or extermination of an ethnic group within a given territory.][Patterson Avenue [African Americans disappeared\[NEW-Wake Forest Biotech building][extension of research building/process on Chestnut Street]. Also form of eugenics [the idea and practice of improving human society through selective breeding practices.]
Why "We the People" of the United States made sign "Break the relationship up" after guy who worked at local restruarant showed an interest in wanting to date me: to improve "We the People" of the United States society. [example Black Wall Street][http://sfbayview.com/2011/what-happened-to-black-wall-street-on-june-1-1921/] The caption under a picture where a child was rescuring a child: "A child rescuer on June 1, 1921 – with Whites out to kill them, Blacks could rely on no one but each other." Part of the issue presented
to the Court is the fact that during the early 1920's whites provided job[s] for Black[s] and that after over 25+ years of seeking employment; then told that if income is not from an illegal/immoral sorce is the equivalent of only whites prividing jobs/income and the Fourteenth Amendment is reason why Respondent[s] who were members of "We the People" of the United States felf comfortable with abuse through employment, etc.. "The white provide the money and the jobs that keep them going and blacks deserve better leadership than to get them into a fight with white people." [p.22][Together Let Us Sweetly Live; Chapter 1]"Improving human society means improving only the human society of "We the People" of the United States or those who do as "We the People" of the United States say [attatck the culture color of all those who do not give up their culture of color or who do not attack their culture of color] for "We the People" of the United States.
In other words until the United States Supreme Court put[s] it in writing in the United States Constitution that the Fourteenth Amendment person [African American born of a Africcan American mother and African American father] have the same inalienable rights in the Preamble of the United States Constitution that "We the People" of the United States have; African Americans will continue with "No more!" and continue to get the same every time.
which consolidated the hold of the tormentor. Translation: The person in the Fourteenth
Amendment is seen as less than "We the People" of the United States therefore has to
do as told [work for][forced into involuntary servitude] and if the Fourteenth Amendment
person doesn't do as told legally can be harassed; etc. to the point of torment=which has been my experience [over 7000 incident[s] of abuse with not intervention and law[s] being passed;that have been passed to allow worse; such as with the law that allowed "Trayvon Martin"
to be shot and authorities to view shooting as ?
Why African American males walk around with Dred lock[s] hairstyle=code=[Dred Scott][not seen as full
United States citizen].
PSS. Also heard Glenn Beck speaking about some student [think in Florida] who went off talking about
wanting to get people [not of color] and then Beck [who created a council of "We the People" of the United States who were required to wear BLACK robes[demonic][symbolic of the continued hindering and robbing of African Americans [why Billy Graham son did not particiapte]; Glenn Beck made statement that there would be a lot more people of color who would be going off; Reason Beck and Rush Limbough know and can speak of what is going on and what is going to happen is because they know the laws in the United States Constitution that gives "We the People" of the United States can be interpreted to give "We the People" of the United States the right to take from African Americans.
Did contack Limbough to ask for intervention in abuse; response was to ignore request; Beck[s] crew had
weird telephone messages/etc.. wrote them down; but same message [ignored]; AS
Socialpeacest
*********************
Part of Statement sending to the Big Court:
Liberty Street ][trained].
[Reason why one of the main dictionary[s] is called [BLACKS]Socialpeacest; There is no such thing as enough which is reference to "provokation"; in other words the only way that any situation is concidered as
worthy is if the people who bring the issue know how to provoke those who have the remedy to act; for Fourteenth Amendment people that ususally means violence in the street[s] or publicity. Heard people on
the radio talking about No more, we not going to take it no more; lie; all it is a recyceled harassment, and
abuse over and over; first abuse was done strictly by "We the People" of the United States; society said stop; that aint right; then "We the people" of the United States started paying the Fourteenth Amendment person to do themselves in [drugs]; then society said that aint right; now the next move is to pay illegal hispanics to abuse the Fourteenth Amendment person [illegals were not born in the United States and are not Fourtheenth Amendment person]; after the hispanics abuse the Fourteenth Amendment person; then the people who knocked down the World Trade Center Tower[s] will be paid to abuse the Fourteeth Amendment person; [part of the reason for the whole September 11, 2001; there had to be a visable acceptable manner
to get negative element[s] from overseas into the United States Culture.
All action[s] are okayed through the United States Constitution that gives "We the People" of the United States inalienable rights to work, have relationships, protect themselves, promote their general welfare[work not food stamps]; which were right[s] that were not given to the person in the Fourteenth Amendment. Solution is to include all Fourteenth Amendment person in having inaleinable rights in the Preamble of the United States Constitution given to "We the People" of the United States. Unitil that is done; African Americans will keep going through the same thing over and over; because the person in "We the People" of the United States can always choose to use the interpretation [which the United States Supreme Court has ruled illegal] that the person in the Fourteenth Amendment is less before the law [Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)] and until the United States Supreme Court puts in writing in the United States Constitution that an African American whose parents are an African American male and female has the same inalienable rights as "We the People" of the United States; Blacks will keep saying the same old thing; "No
more"; do you ever hear of any other race of people that is always attacked; abused, etc.. No!; just African
American[s]; hispanic[s] were brought in to water down the situation as a form of diversion [African Americans familes are being forced to accept hispanics/relationship[s] or have their family member[s] attacked [technical term is ethnic -cleansing][removal or extermination of an ethnic group within a given territory.][Patterson Avenue [African Americans disappeared\[NEW-Wake Forest Biotech building][extension of research building/process on Chestnut Street]. Also form of eugenics [the idea and practice of improving human society through selective breeding practices.]
Why "We the People" of the United States made sign "Break the relationship up" after guy who worked at local restruarant showed an interest in wanting to date me: to improve "We the People" of the United States society. [example Black Wall Street][http://sfbayview.com/2011/what-happened-to-black-wall-street-on-june-1-1921/] The caption under a picture where a child was rescuring a child: "A child rescuer on June 1, 1921 – with Whites out to kill them, Blacks could rely on no one but each other." Part of the issue presented
to the Court is the fact that during the early 1920's whites provided job[s] for Black[s] and that after over 25+ years of seeking employment; then told that if income is not from an illegal/immoral sorce is the equivalent of only whites prividing jobs/income and the Fourteenth Amendment is reason why Respondent[s] who were members of "We the People" of the United States felf comfortable with abuse through employment, etc.. "The white provide the money and the jobs that keep them going and blacks deserve better leadership than to get them into a fight with white people." [p.22][Together Let Us Sweetly Live; Chapter 1]"Improving human society means improving only the human society of "We the People" of the United States or those who do as "We the People" of the United States say [attatck the culture color of all those who do not give up their culture of color or who do not attack their culture of color] for "We the People" of the United States.
In other words until the United States Supreme Court put[s] it in writing in the United States Constitution that the Fourteenth Amendment person [African American born of a Africcan American mother and African American father] have the same inalienable rights in the Preamble of the United States Constitution that "We the People" of the United States have; African Americans will continue with "No more!" and continue to get the same every time.
It was put in the United States
[pre-assigned worth valuation assigned to the Fourteenth Amendment person] or
labour escaping shall be discharged from such service or labour; but shall be
delivered up on claim of the party to who such service or labour maybe due;
Amendment is seen as less than "We the People" of the United States therefore has to
do as told [work for][forced into involuntary servitude] and if the Fourteenth Amendment
person doesn't do as told legally can be harassed; etc. to the point of torment=which has been my experience [over 7000 incident[s] of abuse with not intervention and law[s] being passed;that have been passed to allow worse; such as with the law that allowed "Trayvon Martin"
to be shot and authorities to view shooting as ?
Why African American males walk around with Dred lock[s] hairstyle=code=[Dred Scott][not seen as full
United States citizen].
PSS. Also heard Glenn Beck speaking about some student [think in Florida] who went off talking about
wanting to get people [not of color] and then Beck [who created a council of "We the People" of the United States who were required to wear BLACK robes[demonic][symbolic of the continued hindering and robbing of African Americans [why Billy Graham son did not particiapte]; Glenn Beck made statement that there would be a lot more people of color who would be going off; Reason Beck and Rush Limbough know and can speak of what is going on and what is going to happen is because they know the laws in the United States Constitution that gives "We the People" of the United States can be interpreted to give "We the People" of the United States the right to take from African Americans.
Did contack Limbough to ask for intervention in abuse; response was to ignore request; Beck[s] crew had
weird telephone messages/etc.. wrote them down; but same message [ignored]; AS
"Leonard Pitts column: Teen's death raises painful, pressing questions stated "They do not see you": answer for all those who care: any and all authority in local CSR area; know of/if anything ever happens to me or my family."
Only society [provactaion] can provoke them to see a person or a situation. Please call the "Community Outreach program on 1340 am radio at 896-1340 and request radio station to contact those in authority to intervene so that [Vap] fate is not that of Trayvon Martin. Thank You!
*********************
Part of Statement sending to the Big Court:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Disparate impact has an evidentiary value absent a "stark" pattern. Impact is
not determinative." “Plaintiff must plead enough facts to state a claim for relief.”
Enough is not defined in Black Law[s] dictionary. Enough is referenced to
sufficient; adequate; cause; effect; with effect being to make happen. Cause
produces an effect [to make happen];value [an assigned worth valuation];
assign [to transfer rights]; adequate references to provocation [that would
cause a reasonable person to act without self control and lose any premedi-
tated state of mind, the usual form of adequate provocation is the heat of
passion. Merriam Webster Dictionary.com enough is defined as occurring in
such scope as to fully meet demands, needs or expectations.
Based upon the Preamble of the Constitution, a plaintiff acting as Prose would
never be able to plead enough facts to state a claim for relief. In order for a
Prose to state enough facts for relief, the courts would have to be able to infer
the facts. the Lower Courts mindset is that based upon the viewing the
Petitioner[s] facts from the view point of Fourteenth Amendment person where
the Lower Court[s] placed the Petitioner in the scope of a pre-assigned worth
valuation that set a value to and for the Petitioner at birth based on the desira-
bility and utility to “We the People” of the United States
solidarity of interest” which results in the Blessings of Liberty and Posterity that
would have gone into an African American community but because of the pre-
assigned worth valuation the rights were transferred to Petitioner[s] sibling
[Cintas] because [Cintas] mind s been manipulated through research to respond
to specific cues that are given to force [Cintas] to conform to the desires of "We
the People" of the United States who share “a conscious solidarity of interest".
Same intimidation; concept; different form [cues]; coercion was used on Peti-
tioner[s] mother; do as told-reward-Children not intimidated; [Cintas]-respond to
cues [give the response that "We the People” of the United States
will receive reward [not get punished; is mind control; like a dog; Pet [Trucks on
Plaintiff would never be able to plead enough facts to state a claim because of
the pre-assigned value of importance that the Lower Court[s] mindset; required to
view Plaintiff acting as Prose through the scope of ensuring that any claim/cause
of a Plaintiff acting as Prose would never happen. Therefore a Plaintiff could not
plead enough facts in the Lower Court[s] because all the facts in the world would
not be sufficient to meet the demands that allow the Lower Court[s] to infer the
facts; unless the Plaintiff acting as Prose shared "a conscious solidarity of inter-
est" of "We the People" of the United States
African American culture as "We the People” of the United States
Black Wall Street]or unless the Plaintiff acting as Prose was participating in
cultural genocide, or had an attorney; then the Lower Court[s] would be able to
infer the facts.
Petitioner submitted a “claim of fact”; complaint; in Petitioner[s] own handwriting
because of the urgency of situation and concern for safety due to harassment
/threats, etc., almost daily and constantly. Petitioner[s] complaint tried to convey
the urgency and desperation trough listing as many violations of Petitioner[s]
rights in Petitioner[s] personal life that extended beyond employment but was
attached to the employment discrimination and abuse by the Respondent[s]
which occurred off of the Respondent[s] work premises after Petitioner had been
dismissed from Respondent[s] employment; in areas were Respondent[s harass-
ment had reached in Petitioner[s] life; which included "a” –“?".
