This blog will be about sociology in terms of the experiences encountered within local community. I have a degree in Business Administration, Concentration-Information Systems, 1984; recently (May 2006) completed a Sociology degree from a local state university. Got both degrees from the same university. As of 1/1/11 all information and writings are copyrighted; Please adjust accordingly.
The United States Constitution does not say that a person can't be recognized UNLESS they are a part of the group or only that the restoration from the abuse of that person has to go to the/a group; not a bondman[slave'] or [bondsman for surety[look it up]; Am available for hire for consultation/nothing else.
QUESTION - Is this the United States or another country [secret]? Does Socialpeacest have [6th amendment rights],etc/?
11/28/11[letter resent[6th amendment rights];
To: Mr. W.M
Please resend all emails sent to thvthv@gmx.com; and ask appropriate people/sources to unblock access to thvthv@gmx.com; did see email about NAACP; but did not have a chance to read; and now can't get to email? Below is a copy of email sent on 10/27/11 to you,
R.V.L. and E.L. W.; would appreciate your asking them to resending any response to nonnyyourtz@hotmail.com; did make copies of in file; but did not open email at the time; Would appreciate your asking D. W. Mr. Pr. for a letter stating what I was cleared of; If I do not know what I was cleared of; how am I suppose to know how to adjust to not do it again? Thank You for your response; Citizen of Winston-Salem Forsyth County. [also please send copy to R.L.[T. at D. W. office said that he did not have an official email? And emphasized “R” as being Robert”=”Robbery” of person’s being recognized as a Citizen in any capacity[T=African American female working for males of the larger society and being greatly rewarded for it; check her family[whose got good jobs/promotions, etc. in the mist of an economic hell]
10/27/11
TO: Mr. W.M
RE: Request for letter stating what I was cleared of and Library Rights that were restored.[request based on Sixth Amendment rights].
Spoke to Mr. D.W. [C. M.] and asked if he could speak to Mr. D. Pr. and request that he send a letter in writing stating what I had been cleared of and what library rights had been restored. Mr. W/ said that no such letter would be coming, which is why I am writing to you-to ask you to please ask Mr. W./Pr. to send me a letter stating that I had been cleared and what I had been cleared of and which library rights had been restored.
On 10/18/11 in a phone conversation [which was documented] you said that I should get whatever is done/or said in writing; would appreciate it if you would ask the members in the meeting to please verify that I have been cleared [and of what?] and that my library rights have been restored ][and which library rights have been restored].
Mr. D.W. informed me that I had not been put out of the library and I informed Mr. Watts that I have been put out almost six to seven times without anyone telling me why [asking a question was suddenly given in the phone meeting by Mr. Pratt and Ms. H];But each time the library put me out they did not ever give me a reason; which is why I originally contacted Mr. D.W. and told him that they keep putting me out of the library and not telling me why.
Mr. D.W. gave me a statement of apology and said I could use the library without further harassment and intimidation in June, 2011 only to find four months later[October, 2011]that I am dealing with the[ same situation] of being put out of the library and at the time was not told why-I asked a question about when/where there would be painting] at the C. R.L., so that I could go to the opposite side of the library where they would be painting and about fifteen minutes later-library staff handed me an unsigned letter –telling me to contact the library director-BEFORE [indicating that I was to leaveCSRBL] returning to the library.
Mr. Pr. and Ms. H said that it was because I asked a question; Ms. H’s letter says because I raised an issue ; my question is asking a question about where and when painting would take place to avoid interruptions from the painting/fms; the same as raising an issue?
I am so glad that I was cleared and have a clearance and that my library rights have been restored; PLEASE ask Mr. D.W.,etc. If they can verify what I have been cleared of and what library rights have been restored; think I am entitled to know that as a citizen of Winston-SalemForsythCounty. Have a blessed day.
P. S.CSRBL still has the Marque up with [anme of person who is being systematically harassed [essance managzine] BRIDE magazine covered by DARKNESS magazine with PAULA still working at brach as form of intimidation.
Following is what was written on 11/20/10 on a website of my concerns about “PAULA” and concerns about the WSFCl newly hiring a “PAULA”.
Thank you God that the ------ of "S------------" ----- ----- --- ---- of the ----- ----- -------; especially all participating in the "PAULETTE" through mind control at and through the WSFC 5th St. and CSRBL in Winston-Salem North Carolina. or some would call it organized ----------.
They have been/are stalking me so bad that they tricked the guy who wants to date me (ex-=girlfriend name paulette-highly uneducated so easy to manipulate)into being in a location so that they can manipulate him; he knows that I sometimes go [to the 5th street library] and whenever he goes; they threaten him if he tries to date me. They also have the area blocked off so that people can't go to the center of the library; they have to go downstairs and go through an areas that looks like a prison=intimidating=if you want to get specific/specialized knowledge=expect to encounter the environment that leads to prison[community service without due process][WSFCl [gave me a ]clearance received but no one will tell me what I was cleared of][what library rights were restored=?]; message to people=knowledge that you get in the library does not work; it only leads to prison; if you want to make it; be a ----- and do what you are told=that is to African Americans?
Thank You,
Citizen of Winston-Salem, North Carolina
cc.R.V.L.
E.L. W.
Following is an article about the fact that some rules/laws are in place and they only need to be enforced[in my particular case[the rules and laws can't be enforced[because they would be enforced against the people who are suppose to enforce the rules; so that leaves me in a position of those who enforce the rules trying to constantly force me to retaliate to break one of the rules/laws; which will take attention away from the fact that they are breaking and not enforcing the rules;
The article said:
"Some journalists claim breach of privacy does not really matter, particularly if you are a celeb. Well, it does "matter. An invasion of privacy is worse than burglary. After a burglary, damage can be repaired and possessions can be replaced. But privacy can never be restored. Worse, the private information becomes freely available on the internet. It's as if burglars left behind an open window allowing the world into your home permanently.
If someone breaks into your house, you call the police. They arrest him. They don't ask whether you are rich. Similarly, properly enforced privacy laws should protect you irrespective of your means."
That statement, especially for 14ACOUS[African Americans][not serving [OCOUS] is a lie TO THE EXTENT that unless the 14ACOUS has connections with someone who is observing those who are suppose to enforce the laws[privacy or otherwise] to have rules and laws properly enforced [to protect a 14ACOUS irrespective of their means is a joke." Now if the 14ACPOS agree to work for/be a slave for [OCOUS] they can have some forms/types of protection up to the protection interferring with [OCOUS] agenda[s].
Presently I have no privacy; surrounded by people who [1] go in my house when I leave[2]communicate message when I leave the house; who is or isn't for me in my life[3] therefore what they can and can't do[4] and how they are suppose to treat me; based on what is told to them about my life=no privacy.
"Rules for [14ACOUS] are there. They just need enforcement" is the title of the article; which is stating that the rules/laws are already in place[they fought the civil war][right to civil protection already been established]problem is that those who are suppose to enforce the rules/laws can't because they are the ones to busy violating the rules and making sure that 14ACOUS can't access the enforcement of the rules; thus when the 14ACOUS decides to be the law/enforce the rules themselves; they are looked upon as being a bad person; yet noone addresses the fact that [OCOUS] authority who are suppose to enforce the protections[civil rights] of 14ACOUS; are actually the ones who hinder the enforcement of the laws to protect 14ACOUS[such as the officials at the CSRL].
Socialpeacest
*******************************************
It's early days at the Leveson inquiry, but some pointers have already emerged. First, the conduct of a section of the British press would be unacceptable in any civilised society. Second, the Press Complaints Commission has been largely ineffective. Third, all the witnesses who have so far appeared have made it clear they greatly value a free press.
So how do we stop the outrageous abuse we heard about last week yet keep a free press? A good starting point might be to separate rule-making from rule enforcement. Imagine today's PCC as the rule-maker. There's not much wrong with its code. The problem is the almost complete absence of enforcement. The PCC cannot enforce its rules, it can only ask nicely. But rules that are not enforced are no rules at all.
Enforcement of existing rules by a new body would have no effect on serious journalism or on local newspapers. But it would put a stop to almost the entire range of tabloid misconduct including interference with children, pursuit, intrusion into grief, bugging, secret filming and so on. None of these are allowed under the PCC code without a justified public interest. The rules are there. They just need enforcement.
Effective enforcement would require a statutory backstop. Otherwise a newspaper could simply opt out, as the Express and Star already have done, from the PCC. But statutory powers do not equal state control. The rules are those the newspaper editors themselves have devised. They have nothing to do with the state.
An enforcement body should be able to initiate proceedings without waiting for a complaint. It should also be able to compel mediation. Only if mediation fails should enforcement be considered. It would need the power to fine, also to order an immediate correction (specifying position, prominence and wording). In appropriate circumstances it should be able to require newspapers to leave an individual or family alone as well as ban material from a picture agency that ignored such an order. Deciding whether a breach of privacy should be published at all would be a vital part of its function.
Ideally, the procedure would be informal, involving only an adjudicator, the journalist and the story's subject. In most cases it might even be possible to operate without lawyers, particularly in the mediation phase. If the principle were accepted, it would be necessary to look carefully at the detail, particularly the relationship between this body and the high court. But the basic idea of an independent body with simplified procedures available free of charge must surely be the starting point. It would be rough and ready compared to the luxurious complexity we have now, but what good is luxury if nobody can afford it?
The independent adjudicators would need knowledge of the law and journalism. Such people do exist, for example the academics who teach journalism in our universities. Provided neither government nor media could influence the selection process, almost any qualified person would be better placed to reach a fair decision than a tabloid editor under pressure to sell his paper. But this could also be of great help to an editor who was unsure about the legitimacy of his story. In a difficult case he could apply to the body and then, with its agreement, publish without any legal risk. This would be particularly valuable for local newspapers.
Do we also need new rules? This will become clearer as the inquiry progresses but two areas seem to need attention. First, the case for legitimising publication of certain kinds of information which would currently be illegal, provided the public interest is strong enough. Second, a requirement to give notice of a story likely to invade privacy and cause distress to an individual or his family. In both cases independent assessment is needed before publication because once published it's too late to do anything.
Some journalists claim breach of privacy does not really matter, particularly if you are a celeb. Well, it does matter. An invasion of privacy is worse than burglary. After a burglary, damage can be repaired and possessions can be replaced. But privacy can never be restored. Worse, the private information becomes freely available on the internet. It's as if burglars left behind an open window allowing the world into your home permanently.
If someone breaks into your house, you call the police. They arrest him. They don't ask whether you are rich. Similarly, properly enforced privacy laws should protect you irrespective of your means.
The final difficulty for the Leveson inquiry may be the internet. Clearly, a newspaper that puts unlawful images on the internet should be responsible for removing them. It should not be left to the victim. At the moment, some enthusiasts want the internet to remain a sort of wild west. But it is absurd to suggest that a huge and growing area of commerce and human interaction can exist outside the law. The search engines and service providers are subject to the same laws as the rest of us. Just as a shopkeeper is responsible for what he sells, they are responsible for what they deliver. It is irrational (and ultimately futile) to try to exclude the internet from the rule of law. • For legal reasons this article will not be open to comments
Following is a copy of an email sent to some of the local officials over a local "l" branch in which I was told that I had been cleared; but nobody will tell me what I have been cleared of;etc. The United States Constititution says in Amendment 6 that the person is "to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation"; which I have not been informed of the nature or/and the cause of the accusation.
The Sixth Amendment says: " In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence";
But none of the officials will tell me what I have been accused of; or charged?;which is a violation of my constitutional rights as a "CITIZEN BORN in the UNITED STATES" in the [citizen of the United States in the 14TH AMENDMENT];I have asked what have I been cleared of at least thirty to forty times by phone, email for at least two months[getting ready to do into December,2011]=?
A criminal defendant has the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him. Therefore, an indictment must allege all the ingredients of the crime to such a degree of precision that it would allow the accused to assert double jeopardy if the same charges are brought up in subsequent prosecution.[8] The Supreme Court held in United States v. Carll, 105 U.S.611 (1881) that “in an indictment ... it is not sufficient to set forth the offense in the words of the statute, unless those words of themselves fully, directly, and expressly, without any uncertainty or ambiguity, set forth all the elements necessary to constitute the offense intended to be punished.” Vague wording, even if taken directly from a statute, does not suffice. However, the government is not required to hand over written copies of the indictment free of charge.[9]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Please resend all emails sent to thvthv@gmx.com; and ask appropriate people/sources to unblock access to thvthv@gmx.com; did see email about NAACP; but did not have a chance to read; and now can't get to email? Below is a copy of email sent on 10/27/11 to you,
R.V.L. and E.L. W.; would appreciate your asking them to resend any response to nonnyyourtz@hotmail.com; did make copies of in file; but did not open email at the time; Would appreciate your asking D. W. Mr. Pr. for a letter stating what I was cleared of; If I do not know what I was cleared of; how am I suppose to know how to adjust to not do it again? Thank You for your response; Citizen of Winston-Salem Forsyth County. [also please send copy to R.L.[T. at D. W. office said that he did not have an official email? And emphasized “R” as being Robert”=”Robbery” of person’s being recognized as a Citizen in any capacity[T=African American female working for males of the larger society and being greatly rewarded for it; check her family[whose got good jobs/promotions, etc. in the mist of an economic hell]
10/27/11
TO: Mr. W.M
RE: Request for letter stating what I was cleared of and Library Rights that were restored.
Spoke to Mr. D.W. [C. M.] and asked if he could speak to Mr. D. Pr. and request that he send a letter in writing stating what I had been cleared of and what library rights had been restored. Mr. W/ said that no such letter would be coming, which is why I am writing to you-to ask you to please ask Mr. W./Pr. to send me a letter stating that I had been cleared and what I had been cleared of and which library rights had been restored.
On 10/18/11 in a phone conversation [which was documented] you said that I should get whatever is done/or said in writing; would appreciate it if you would ask the members in the meeting to please verify that I have been cleared [and of what?] and that my library rights have been restored ][and which library rights have been restored].
Mr. D.W. informed me that I had not been put out of the library and I informed Mr. Watts that I have been put out almost six to seven times without anyone telling me why [asking a question was suddenly given in the phone meeting by Mr. Pratt and Ms. H];But each time the library put me out they did not ever give me a reason; which is why I originally contacted Mr. D.W. and told him that they keep putting me out of the library and not telling me why.
Mr. D.W. gave me a statement of apology and said I could use the library without further harassment and intimidation in June, 2011 only to find four months later[October, 2011]that I am dealing with the[ same situation] of being put out of the library and at the time was not told why-I asked a question about when/where there would be painting] at the C. R.L., so that I could go to the opposite side of the library where they would be painting and about fifteen minutes later-library staff handed me an unsigned letter –telling me to contact the library director-BEFORE [indicating that I was to leave CSRBL] returning to the library.
Mr. Pr. and Ms. H said that it was because I asked a question; Ms. H’s letter says because I raised an issue ; my question is asking a question about where and when painting would take place to avoid interruptions from the painting/fms; the same as raising an issue?
I am so glad that I was cleared and have a clearance and that my library rights have been restored; PLEASE ask Mr. D.W.,etc. If they can verify what I have been cleared of and what library rights have been restored; think I am entitled to know that as a citizen of Winston-SalemForsythCounty. Have a blessed day.
P. S. CSRBL still has the Marque up with [anme of person who is being systematically harassed [essance managzine] BRIDE magazine covered by DARKNESS magazine with PAULA still working at brach as form of intimidation.
Following is what was written on 11/20/10 on a website of my concerns about “PAULA” and concerns about the WSFCl newly hiring a “PAULA”.
Thank you God that the ------ of "S------------" ----- ----- --- ---- of the ----- ----- -------; especially all participating in the "PAULETTE" through mind control at and through the WSFC 5th St. and CSRBL in Winston-Salem North Carolina. or some would call it organized ----------.
They have been/are stalking me so bad that they tricked the guy who wants to date me (ex-=girlfriend name paulette-highly uneducated so easy to manipulate)into being in a location so that they can manipulate him; he knows that I sometimes go [to the 5th street library] and whenever he goes; they threaten him if he tries to date me. They also have the area blocked off so that people can't go to the center of the library; they have to go downstairs and go through an areas that looks like a prison=intimidating=if you want to get specific/specialized knowledge=expect to encounter the environment that leads to prison[community service without due process][WSFCl [gave me a ]clearance received but no one will tell me what I was cleared of][what library rights were restored=?]; message to people=knowledge that you get in the library does not work; it only leads to prison; if you want to make it; be a ----- and do what you are told=that is to African Americans?
Thank You,
Citizen of Winston-Salem, North Carolina
cc.R.V.L.
E.L. W.
7118 [white male] [license plate]stopped at corner coming out of 14ACOUS neighborhood=?[tried to wait for me to cross street; I waited until he made a right hand turn onto Carver Road[street on the left had side just before the WSFC Carver School Road library] Upon getting to the library there were two 14ACOUS females[prostitues in disguise] that were at the top of stairs[way I ususally go] (as if to say follow us) and there were about five OCOUS at top of stairs at side door of Forsyth Tech Mazie Woodruff Center beside some kind of "hertz"[name of rental company located on MLK near the new business center for 14ACOUS training before getting started in business] machine [where 14ACOUS were sitting]; then upon walking around the Forsyth Tech Mazie Woodruff Center there was parked at the next entrance a white van[empty] with "electric" on it with an empty mercedis parked behind it [witchcraft] ater going to dinner on 11/13/11[have blogged the the number 13 many a times; part of court case; know the number 13 is used to communicate to OCOUS something about 14ACOUS]; walking up to WSFC CSR library on the door is a happy thanksgiving sign=lime green like the place mats on table of person's house on CSR where I ate dinner; the sign said, "HAPPY THANKSGIVING"; then upon coming into the library [one magazine about "drug addiction" on the floor at the entrance of the 2nd library door]; upon coming into the library there is a NEW person at the WSFC CSR library [an African American male=?][that is African from African].
Message=because I went to dinner with [Malcom in the Middle][Malcom and Eddie]etc. a guy name Malcom who is on a kidney machine taking dialysis[A Medical procedure in which this technique of molecular separation is used to remove metabolic waste products or toxic substances from the blood. Dialysis is required for individuals with severe kidney failure.]ttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/DIALYSIS
Interesingly Malcom on Dialysis also worked with a guy by the name of EDDIE about the time the television movie Malcom and Eddie came out=?
CODE=???=possible=you have hit the jackpot=help OCOUS to help kill or cause Malcom[like the African American males who would be future Malcom X's][standing up for the culture/hertiage/rights of African American to exercise their inalienable rights vs having to follow directives and you can enjoy being given the directives of males of the larger society to tell you what to do to make sure that the African American male never reaches their full potential to protect the culture and heritiage of African Americans while you help the males of the larger society tear the African American culture/heritage down and in the meantime the males of the larger society will put in African males from Africa as a fill in so it will not be so noticeable;=Person who's house I ate dinner ate=goes to the same church where aunt and cousin and the guy who worked with the guy who wanted to date me [who moved out and person who drove authority car moved into the house behind me] goes, where the pastor is an African male whose whole congregation is African Americans who are being used to tear down the African American community to replace it with Africans from Africa . As long as the African Americans [male and female] help to rob from the African American people, the males of the larger society [authority] leave them alone [as long as they follow the directives of the males of the larger society=??]
ANSWER TO QUESTION=WHEN males of the larger society follow the directives of African American males; which include telling the males of the larger society, who they can and can't have in their life, what they can and can't do, who they can and can't be with.
Until then my prayer request to those of you who know prayer is that God will reveal if this is the United States based upon the United States Constitution or if this is the United States before the United States Constitution was written; then that the Supreme Most High God [over all of man's systems] will instruct me of how to live and prosper as a person who does not or will ever have to follow directives of males of the larger society regardless of which United States exists to the point that all those who are following the directives of males of the larger society are revealed to set free those in bondage that want to follow the directives of the Supreme Most High God and that God will give lead and guide them[people who want to be set free from bondages] and give them [people who want to be set free from bondages] protection from those who try and force them to follow directives and if all else fails, as son[tricked into being gay[he and his partner] of person where dinner was eaten on 11/13/11 said, "Carver Road is like Country Club Road[where all of the white rich people live] almost like a gated community=confirms what the African American guy said last week=the authorities would not allow him to come onto Carver Road; guess that means that there are a lot of streets that are being used in secret, where the general public isn't allowed where males of the larger society in authority force the females in the neighborhood into serving males of the larger society [in a negative manner].
To the next situation in church,also on Carver Road;except this situation goes back to 1991 [when my brother was murdered and authrities never figured out who did it]; three females who sit in the back of me ; and two of the females husbands=[both have been married for a long time]-Evon Rucker and Buddy Rucker; Neice Rucker/married name and her husband; and Neice's best friend-female. For the second week; Neice has taken her purse and hit me hard enough to knock me down; person in charge of church and the temporary pastor saw her this Sunday past=Neice, Evon, Buddy all use to live or be in the area where my brother was murdered question is what is their connection[they KNOW something].Interesting also that these females keep hitting me with their PURSE=MESSAGE=equal you don't make no MONEY unless you are a prostitute for males of the larger society=excuse me=but wasn't that what slavery was all about; MONEY; thought the civil war settled that African Americans can make make their own MONEY without having to follow the directives of the slave master=????? which means that making MONEY for anybody who wants to work should not be a problem regardless of color including not having to follow directives to be able to work without inturruption/harassment and abuse for not following directives.
Swn8384[Licence plate of African American male who turned around in M------'s driveway] day after going to dinner with his mother's [from New York City] who called her cousin who has the name of the guy who wanted to date me]friend. The mother's friend, son[by marriage] got married the week before [ called their cousin who has my name]=too coincidental along witht he fact that Malcomn's mother friend worked for Reynold's Health center for over thirty years and is retired[who did a lot of different things in the spirit realm that she thinks that I wasn't aware of]=????
The Malcomn and Eddie show/s sort of like the BERNIE MAC Show=way to communicate to bastards who are robbing people of their lives of what the person who will not follow directives for the African American community is doing. That way those who give directives know what directives to give to people to ensure that no progress in the African American community is made.
Know directives=Hanes Hosiery Recreation Center-Person with name similar to Richie got in the truck with C--ch Art=?? after started typing up documents for Supreme Court Case[No evening hours=cut hours short for somebody][WSFC Public Library=three hours plus harassment=no concentration[plus no serious concentration if either place] including Carl Russell Recreation Center=TWO hours=anything done will be done to the 14th Amendment Citizen of the United States[Blacks/children] [3-4pm children hour] 4-5pm 2nd hour with children].
Please be informed that if anything happens to me=http://www.forsyth.cc/library/ =
Schedule Your Next Meeting @ the Library=DIRECTIVE to write a book=no blogging.
Concept= http://www.originalintent.org/edu/14thamend.php verification of Sociology Area and the TWO concept=do not want to write a book=would like to have my family and friends back =and do not want to follow directives. I am a civilian regardless of being a "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES".
Civilian =a. apersonwhoseprimaryoccupationiscivilornonmilitary [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/civilian].
Check Sociology Blog=first and only comment from JASMIN="Wow, you are very racist against white people."=[thanks for the comment Jasmin]=[first comment]which reminded me that on 10/31/11-I walked from the Northeast side of town to the Southwest part of town=seemed like five to seven miles to get some food and help with utilities; Walked through the WSSU campus/Martin Luther King Street/where as soon as I approached the intersection after crossing over the bridge[JUST BEING OBSERVANT]=there was a security cart[male of the larger society]; then there was a WSSU shuttle bus[males of the larger society]; the stop light was red-another WSSU shuttle bus[African American female[think]-turned in left off of MLK; so crossed in front of it before the light turned-African American female and the illusion of a male[too feminine=?]walked in front of me; asked them what class they were going to; one said marching band techniques=? and the other history ?; then as I kept walking in front of the two students noticed that a male of the larger society was walking parallel to me accross the street in front of the nursing building. I was walking south on the east side; he was walking south on the west side; then noticed that there was a female of the larger society[no other students in sight] walking towards me=technique=same as they used when got Sociology degree=sandwich=and then futher on MLK looked up hill and there was male of the larger society out frong leading small group of African American boys[looked like babies next to male of larger society][male of larger society knew what that he was suppose to commuicate give the directive of follow male of the larger society=things go easier.
The point is that Jasmin's comment reminded me to ask ANYONE reading this blog to go and visit WSSU and see for yourself; the members of the larger society are very proud of what they are doing =creating and keeping the mindset of their forefathers in the minds of the future workers of color=humbled 14th Amendment "CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES". [http://www.originalintent.org/edu/14thamend.php]
To Jasmin-don't know if you still read this blog or not; but I am not racist=just blog about FACTS=and what I think they mean based upon the view that I have been given in society.And if you ever have a chance to go to WSSU-go and see for yourself; have no personal views; take pen and paper and just write what you see.
After reading part of the segment on the meaning of "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES" [http://www.originalintent.org/edu/14thamend.php] and the fact that there are TWO meanings along with looking up the word "[INTERDICT]" [toimpedebysteady BOMBARDMENT [interdiction] which lead to the word "DIRECTIVES"=Misdirection/wrong information=which lead to the word ORDER. So for those who are not aware they are being given the wrong direction and order [and based upon the meaning of the "Citizen of the United States"] to advance or prosper in life [as a other person-#2] while advancing the life and prosperity of the original "Citizen of the United States". So all directives in the African American community are misdirection/wrong information including what is coming through the churches to destroy [To tear down or break up; demolish] the African American community to help in the build the larger society [ think the larger society is called the Caucasian society]=HUMMMM=let me see if one looks back or presently or in the future what does one see=??? in the past=African Americans were given "DIRECTIVES" by members of the larger society and had no choice in the matter if they did not want to be killed or beat. HUMMMM=presently today with twenty plus years of documentation=it appears that "DIRECTIVES" were given but not followed=WONDER WHY=??? COULD IT BE THE PERSON THOUGHT THAT THEY WERE ACTUALLY FREE=????
Then if one considers the fact that the original "CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES [white males] are the same ones who are making the decisions today for the 14th Amendment "CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES" [BLACK PEOPLE] along with the ILLUSIONARY PETS [People with skin of color; but actually following "DIRECTIVES"]=the same concept [different version]as during the plight of the African Americans in the past who were given "DIRECTIVES" by members of the larger society who had no choice in following the "DIRECTIVES if they did not want to be killed or beat.
Then if one considers the fact that the 14th Amendment "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES" [African Americans] ONLY option is to go before the United States Courts which support the United States Constitution which states technically that the original "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES"[white males] has "inalienable rights" whereas the 14th Amendment "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES"ONLY has "Civil Rights" [rights given by law]which explains why after over twenty plus years of constant complaints have been ignored=the original "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES" is NOT ALLOWED to recognize any 14th Amendment "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES " because the 14th Amendment "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES [African American] has no inalienable rights [based upon the United States Constitution]; And as long as the 14th Amendment "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES" is not following the directives given by original "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES"; the 14th Amendment "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES is out of order and not to be recognized by original "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES".
Which leaves the the 14th Amendment "CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES" who is not following "DIRECTIVES" living in a country that does not exist=where "inalienable rights" are allowed and recognized and punishment to those who violate their inalienable rights= why after decades of reporting the abuse, harassment, etc.=nobody ever loses their job=in fact they are promoted=makes a lot of sense now.
1. A military communication in which policy is established or a specific action is ordered. 2. A plan issued with a view to putting it into effect when so directed, or in the event that a stated contingency arises. 3. Broadly speaking, any communication which initiates or governs action, conduct, or procedure.
an instruction; order
adj
1. tending to direct; directing
2. indicating direction
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Directives
directive - a pronouncement encouraging or banning some activity; "the
boss loves to send us directives"
directive - showing the way by conducting or leading; imposing direction on; "felt his mother's directing arm around him"; "the directional role of science on industrial progress"
directive - showing the way by conducting or leading; imposing direction on; "felt his mother's directing arm around him"; "the directional role of science on industrial progress"
Directives, used by United States Government agencies (particularly the United States Department of Defense) to convey policies, responsibilities, and procedures
2. To have or take charge of; control. See Synonyms at conduct.
3. To give authoritative instructions to: directed the student to answer.
4. To cause to move toward a goal; aim. See Synonyms at aim.
5. To show or indicate the way for: directed us to the airport.
6. To cause to move in or follow a straight course: directed their fire at the target.
7. To indicate the intended recipient on (a letter, for example).
8. To address or adapt (remarks, for example) to a specific person, audience, or purpose.
9.
a. To give guidance and instruction to (actors or musicians, for example) in the rehearsal and performance of a work.
b. To supervise the performance of.
v.intr.
1. To give commands or directions.
2. To conduct a performance or rehearsal.
adj.
1. Proceeding without interruption in a straight course or line; not deviating or swerving: a direct route.
2. Straightforward and candid; frank: a direct response.
3. Having no intervening persons, conditions, or agencies; immediate: direct contact; direct sunlight.
4. Effected by action of the voters, rather than through elected representatives or delegates: direct elections.
5. Being of unbroken descent; lineal: a direct descendant of the monarch.
6. Consisting of the exact words of the writer or speaker: a direct quotation; direct speech.
7. Lacking compromising or mitigating elements; absolute: direct opposites.
8. Mathematics Varying in the same manner as another quantity, especially increasing if another quantity increases or decreasing if it decreases.
9. Astronomy Designating west-to-east motion of a planet in the same direction as the sun's movement against the stars.
10. Sports Being a free kick in soccer by which a goal can be scored without the ball being touched by a second player.
adv.
Straight; directly.
lead·ing 1(ldng)
adj.
1. Having a position in the lead; foremost: the leading candidate.
2. Chief; principal: the leading cause of high inflation. See Synonyms at chief.
3. Of or performing a lead in a theatrical production: a leading role; a leading lady.
4. Formulated so as to elicit a desired response: a leading question.
lead·ing 2(ldng)
n.
1. A border or rim of lead, as around a windowpane.
2. Printing The spacing between lines, usually measured in points.
leading1
adj
1. guiding, directing, or influencing
2.(prenominal) principal or primary
3. in the first position the leading car in the procession
4. (Mathematics) Maths (of a coefficient) associated with the term of highest degree in a polynomial containing one variable in 5x2 + 2x + 3, 5 is the leading coefficient
leadinglyadvor·der(ôrdr)
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/order
n.
1. A condition of logical or comprehensible arrangement among the separate elements of a group.
2.
a. A condition of methodical or prescribed arrangement among component parts such that proper functioning or appearance is achieved: checked to see that the shipping department was in order.
b. Condition or state in general: The escalator is in good working order.
3.
a. The established system of social organization: "Every revolution exaggerates the evils of the old order"(C. Wright Mills).
b. A condition in which freedom from disorder or disruption is maintained through respect for established authority: finally restored order in the rebellious provinces.
4. A sequence or arrangement of successive things: changed the order of the files.
5. The prescribed form or customary procedure: the order of worship.
6. An authoritative indication to be obeyed; a command or direction.
7.
a. A command given by a superior military officer requiring obedience, as in the execution of a task.
b. orders Formal written instructions to report for military duty at a specified time and place.
8.
a. A commission or instruction to buy, sell, or supply something.
b. That which is supplied, bought, or sold.
9.
a. A request made by a customer at a restaurant for a portion of food.
b. The food requested.
10. Law A direction or command delivered by a court or other adjudicative body and entered into the record but not necessarily included in the final judgment or verdict.
11. Ecclesiastical
a. Any of several grades of the Christian ministry: the order of priesthood.
b. The rank of an ordained Christian minister or priest. Often used in the plural.
c. The sacrament or rite of ordination. Often used in the plural.
12. Any of the nine grades or choirs of angels.
13. A group of persons living under a religious rule: Order of Saint Benedict.
14. An organization of people united by a common fraternal bond or social aim.
15.
a. A group of people upon whom a government or sovereign has formally conferred honor for unusual service or merit, entitling them to wear a special insignia: the Order of the Garter.
b. The insignia worn by such people.
16. A social class. Often used in the plural: the lower orders.
17. A class defined by the common attributes of its members; a kind.
18. Degree of quality or importance; rank: poetry of a high order.
19. Architecture
a. Any of several styles of classical architecture characterized by the type of column and entablature employed. Of the five generally accepted classical orders, the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian orders are Greek and the Tuscan and Composite orders are Roman.
b. A style of building: a cathedral of the Gothic order.
20. Biology A taxonomic category of organisms ranking above a family and below a class. See Table at taxonomy.
21. Mathematics
a. The sum of the exponents to which the variables in a term are raised; degree.
b. An indicated number of successive differentiations to be performed.
c. The number of elements in a finite group.
d. The number of rows or columns in a determinant or matrix.
v.or·dered, or·der·ing, or·ders
v.tr.
1. To issue a command or instruction to.
2. To give a command or instruction for: The judge ordered a recount of the ballots.
3. To direct to proceed as specified: ordered them off the property.
4. To give an order for; request to be supplied with.
5. To put into a methodical, systematic arrangement. See Synonyms at arrange.
6. To predestine; ordain.
in·struc·tion(n-strkshn)
n.
1. The act, practice, or profession of instructing.
2.
a. Imparted knowledge.
b. An imparted or acquired item of knowledge; a lesson.
3. Computer Science A sequence of bits that tells a central processing unit to perform a particular operation and can contain data to be used in the operation.
4.
a. An authoritative direction to be obeyed; an order. Often used in the plural: had instructions to be home by midnight.
b. instructions Detailed directions on procedure: read the instructions for assembly
instruction[ɪnˈstrʌkʃən]
n
1. a direction; order
2. the process or act of imparting knowledge; teaching; education
3. (Electronics & Computer Science / Computer Science) Computing a part of a program consisting of a coded command to the computer to perform a specified function
instructionaladj
dic·tate(dktt, dk-tt)
v.dic·tat·ed, dic·tat·ing, dic·tates
v.tr.
1. To say or read aloud to be recorded or written by another: dictate a letter.
2.
a. To prescribe with authority; impose: dictated the rules of the game.
b. To control or command:
1.To say or read aloud material to be recorded or written by another: dictated for an hour before leaving for the day.
2. To issue orders or commands.
n.(dktt)
1. A directive; a command.
2. A guiding principle:
Synonyms: dictate, decree, IMPOSE, ordain, prescribe
These verbs mean to set forth expressly and authoritatively
How to Give Orders to Your Employees
by Michelle Langley , Demand Media
Making yourself accessible to employees will help orders to be executed properly.
Every manager must give directives to employees, but it can be more difficult than it sounds. Employees must feel respected and must be able to understand the orders you are giving. Most of all, employees shouldn't feel as though they are being given orders at all. Rather, treat your employees as though you are giving them instruction sto help you run the company, and you'll likely get excellent results.
Step 1
Use respectful words such as "please" when giving orders to your employees. Although they are obliged to follow your instructions, you will establish goodwill that will make your job as manager easier. Employees are more likely to respect a manager who shows them respect as well.
Step 2
Give clear instructions to your employees. Vague instructions such as, "Mop the floor," may not be sufficient. You may need to provide instructions such as, "Use hot water and the blue cleaner to mop the floor in the kitchen."
Step 3
Make yourself available to answer questions that employees might have, otherwise you risk the job being done incorrectly or not at all. Human resources expert Stewart Liff recommends that you "manage by walking around." Liff points out that this sends the message to employees that you want them to succeed.
Step 4
Use a firm, confident tone of voice when giving orders to employees. If you give a directive, yet use a tone that is questioning or wavering, your directions may not be deemed important.
Step 5
Let employees know the reason you are giving them an order. For example, you might say, "Please count how many cheesecakes are in the freezer so that we'll know if we need to order more for the Saturday rush." This approach helps employees to feel like they are part of the team. Of course, this is not necessary if you are merely asking employees to do routine tasks for which the reason is already clear.
Step 6
Put your request in writing if it is complex. This helps to avoid confusion and can increase accurate follow-through. Give your employees verbal instructions to reinforce your memo.
Tips & Warnings
·Be sensitive to individual differences when giving instructions to your employees. For example, all employees may not understand high-level vocabulary, and some may need you to repeat instructions.
·Give employees frequent verbal feedback on their performance. Feedback can reinforce excellent performance and can give employees an opportunity to improve, if necessary.
·Be sure to give orders only to employees who are under your direct supervision. Otherwise, employees might have to cope with conflicting instructions.
