Friday, April 08, 2011
United States Supreme Court
4/8/11
On 4/4/11was sent a copy of LR83.9b
SELECTION OF CASES FOR MEDIATED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES
(a) and a first two sentences of (b)-which state that DISCRETIONARY SELECTION BY THE COURT_ IN ITS DISCRETION, THE cOURT MAY ORDER A MEDIATED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN ANY ACTION NOT AUTOMATICALLY SELECTED UNDER=??-and the rest of the info was not included; called lady who said go to their website=which is The Middle District Court of North Carolina and look under local rules=which is verification that the case could have been sent to mediation; but it wasn't- which allowed it to be used to/for as a bargin chip to pay hispanics for helping one race to perform CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION on another race=?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://ecf.ncmd.uscourts.gov/
Following is a copy of the letter that will be sending to the EEOC [have sent almost five or more letters with no response=?
The letter is as follows:UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
1 FIRST STREET,
N. E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20543
Notice of Motion/Extended Time
Socialpeacest
00-0000
Plaintiff
vs.
---'s -l--
Defendant INTERVENTION ON
DEFENDANT’S SIDE
Fact that concern that Wal-mart Case #00000---'s -l-- vs Dukes-may be form of robbery of other WAl Mart cases, specifically 00-0000 because largest percentage of the plaintiff’s in Wal-Mart case #00000 maybe hispanic which may have connection withthe fact that all the the documents signed by EEOC were hispanics.
Method/system to rob from one race of people and pay another hispanic people at the expense of another/AA race.
FACTS
1. Ex-employer-H---- H------ M--- -used hispanics to intentionally harass intervener every day for two years. Intervener filed complaint with EEOC Greensboro Office in 1998. (people associated with Bojangles newspaper incident always had vechicles on employer's lot).
2. EEOC gave intervener right to sue letter in 1998(plaintiff dropped case because of no attorney.
3. Intervener filed charge against Bojangle’s in 2007 -hired gay guy by name of Love and communicated to intervener that intervener couldn’t date if working; EEOC gave intervener a right to sue letter- Intervener dropped the case because of no attorney.
4. Intervener filed EEOC charge against ---'sc --l- in 2009 - discrimination;
ALL documents [including a request for a FOYI from another district] signed by a hispanic.
1. Investigator Rafael A. Nieves
Did investigation in less than one day Greensboro EEOC Office
2. Local Greensboro Office Director- Jose G. Rosenberg
Right to Sue Letter 2days letter signed Greensboro EEOC Office
No mediation.
3. Deputy District Director - Carols R. Villescas
FOYI (Freedom of Information Act- Charlotte EEOC Office
An attorney said that by Law there should have been a court ordered mediation=!!!!!!!!! How much did Sam’Club Offer?, he asked;told him that there wasn’t any mediation; I wondered why they(EEOC-hispanic investigated and signed right to sue letter-in two days=no investigation) did not offer mediation. .
I want the court to investigate into why all hispanics signed my documents(If it is code)to not help person or to help decieve person of their rights; identify how the Wal-Mart vs Dukes case is associated or a form of swindling intervener out of rights of case 11-1047 in 4th circuit appealante court in VA.
Intervener asks the court to a response, the makeup and attitude of the United Staes Court system is well know through out the world; which includes the fact that the vast majority of the court is of the same race that some of the elements of part of the original complaint concerning the race and gender of the people who approached demo cart when working at defendant’s compnay; thus if Pro se were to request that all people of the said race to please dismiss them selves for practice/sitting in/on the case; there would probably be no one to hear the case.
All the hispanics in the case never had any intention of the case ever going foward or being heard with any real legitimacy because they knew that the case would be good to be used to help push their case through which is basically made up of hispanic women; while the 11-1047 case would be a good case to beguile, delude,deceive, distort, cheat,defraud, through fraud.
On 4/4/11was sent a copy of LR83.9b
SELECTION OF CASES FOR MEDIATED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES
(a) and a first two sentences of (b)-which state that DISCRETIONARY SELECTION BY THE COURT_ IN ITS DISCRETION, THE cOURT MAY ORDER A MEDIATED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN ANY ACTION NOT AUTOMATICALLY SELECTED UNDER=??-and the rest of the info was not included; called lady who said go to their website=which is The Middle District Court of North Carolina and look under local rules=which is verification that the case could have been sent to mediation; but it wasn't- which allowed it to be used to/for as a bargin chip to pay hispanics for helping one race to perform CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION on another race=?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://ecf.ncmd.uscourts.gov/
Following is a copy of the letter that will be sending to the EEOC [have sent almost five or more letters with no response=?
The letter is as follows:UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
1 FIRST STREET,
N. E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20543
Notice of Motion/Extended Time
Socialpeacest
00-0000
Plaintiff
vs.
---'s -l--
Defendant INTERVENTION ON
DEFENDANT’S SIDE
Fact that concern that Wal-mart Case #00000---'s -l-- vs Dukes-may be form of robbery of other WAl Mart cases, specifically 00-0000 because largest percentage of the plaintiff’s in Wal-Mart case #00000 maybe hispanic which may have connection withthe fact that all the the documents signed by EEOC were hispanics.
Method/system to rob from one race of people and pay another hispanic people at the expense of another/AA race.
FACTS
1. Ex-employer-H---- H------ M--- -used hispanics to intentionally harass intervener every day for two years. Intervener filed complaint with EEOC Greensboro Office in 1998. (people associated with Bojangles newspaper incident always had vechicles on employer's lot).
2. EEOC gave intervener right to sue letter in 1998(plaintiff dropped case because of no attorney.
3. Intervener filed charge against Bojangle’s in 2007 -hired gay guy by name of Love and communicated to intervener that intervener couldn’t date if working; EEOC gave intervener a right to sue letter- Intervener dropped the case because of no attorney.
4. Intervener filed EEOC charge against ---'sc --l- in 2009 - discrimination;
ALL documents [including a request for a FOYI from another district] signed by a hispanic.
1. Investigator Rafael A. Nieves
Did investigation in less than one day Greensboro EEOC Office
2. Local Greensboro Office Director- Jose G. Rosenberg
Right to Sue Letter 2days letter signed Greensboro EEOC Office
No mediation.
3. Deputy District Director - Carols R. Villescas
FOYI (Freedom of Information Act- Charlotte EEOC Office
An attorney said that by Law there should have been a court ordered mediation=!!!!!!!!! How much did Sam’Club Offer?, he asked;told him that there wasn’t any mediation; I wondered why they(EEOC-hispanic investigated and signed right to sue letter-in two days=no investigation) did not offer mediation. .
I want the court to investigate into why all hispanics signed my documents(If it is code)to not help person or to help decieve person of their rights; identify how the Wal-Mart vs Dukes case is associated or a form of swindling intervener out of rights of case 11-1047 in 4th circuit appealante court in VA.
Intervener asks the court to a response, the makeup and attitude of the United Staes Court system is well know through out the world; which includes the fact that the vast majority of the court is of the same race that some of the elements of part of the original complaint concerning the race and gender of the people who approached demo cart when working at defendant’s compnay; thus if Pro se were to request that all people of the said race to please dismiss them selves for practice/sitting in/on the case; there would probably be no one to hear the case.
All the hispanics in the case never had any intention of the case ever going foward or being heard with any real legitimacy because they knew that the case would be good to be used to help push their case through which is basically made up of hispanic women; while the 11-1047 case would be a good case to beguile, delude,deceive, distort, cheat,defraud, through fraud.
