Thursday, January 13, 2011
Inferiority in civil society if African American not working for the other society
Everything in the "Strauder v West Virginia argument" basically sums up what they made the goal of my life: to exercise the equality of ALL the Civil Rights "that the superior race enjoy," and to have the protection of the general government, in the enjoyment of such rights, whenever they should be denied by the States. Whether the amendment had other, and if so what, purposes not decided." And to stop being attacked by anybody who believes[works for] that there is a superior race(not my words).
They made the goal of my life: to exercise the equality of ALL the Civil Rights "that the superior race enjoy," and to have the protection of the general government, in the enjoyment of such rights, By the constant blocks and attacks of my civil right to pursue life, liberty and property by the constant intentional minipulation to ensure that the normal uninterrupted flow in the pursuit of life, liberty and property did not occure; because to allow all the civil rights "that the superior race enjoy" and protection of the general government in the enjoyment of such rights means that the person would be pursuing the natural heritage; And the twenty puls years of documention verify the lack of equality of all the civil rights of the superior race and the lack of protection of the enjoyment of those rights.
In the Strauder v West Virginia argument because I am an African American the general government should work harder to protect and to ensure that I have and enjoy all the Civil Rights of the superior race (not my words); and not be forced to give up the enjoyment of my civil rights (natural heritage) and that IF there are those who are opposing my enjoying my civil rights (natural heritage) or who have or are developing systems methods or ways to interfere with my enjoying my civil rights(natural heritage); then the general government should not impose discrimination on African Americans for their enjoying their civil rights; but the general government should protect the African American in the enjoyment of their civil rights; not force African Americans to assimiate into the civil rights of what the superior race(not my words)enjoys; nor should African Americans be punished for enjoying the civil rights (natural heritage); which is what the twenty plus years of document verifies; punishment for:exercising the equality of ALL the Civil Rights "that the superior race enjoy" meaning that I reconize and understand that there are traps
[discriminations, imposed by public authority, which imply legal inferiority in civil society, lessen the security of their rights, and are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject race.] And if that exists the person cannot [exercise the equality of ALL the Civil Rights "that the superior race enjoy"] because they are constantly fighting for the right to enjoy their natural heritage, which at least in Winston-Salem, North Carolina has been classified as - discriminations, imposed by public authority, which imply legal inferiority in civil society, lessen the security of their rights, and are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject race. ALTHOUGH in Winston-Salem an African American can JOIN the other race to avoid the punishment of being an African American.
The ORIGINAL goal was to obtain employment applied for in the city of birth; But,
discriminations, imposed by public authority, which imply legal inferiority in civil society, lessen the security of their rights, and are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject race have directed the goal to be - employment/income that eliminates being forced to do a job not identified on an application or something illegal or ilmoral. And that myself and family are not punished for not doing the job not identified on the application or yeilding to discriminations, imposed by public authority, which imply legal inferiority in civil society, lessen the security of their rights, and are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject race.
In Strauder v West Virginia it was argued and decided that people of color are to secure ALL CIVIL RIGHTS and PROTECTION of the general government in the enjoyment of such rights. The twenty plus years of documention are of the Civil Rights and Protection of those rights that have been denied and are not secure as they should be.
It stated in the "Strauder v West Virginia argument" that “the amendment not only gave citizenship and the privileges of citizenship to persons of color, but denied to any State the power to withhold from them the equal protection of the laws, and invested Congress with power, by appropriate legislation, to enforce its provisions.” One of the organizations (legal) tried to get me to sign a form about citizenship-whereas it states that the fourteenth amendment gave African Americans citizenship and the privileges of citizenship and denied to any State the power to withhold equal protection of the laws; BUT the twenty plus years of documentation are of those rights and privileges of citizenship; as well as equal protection of laws/etc. being denied/withheld.
The third point in Strauder v. West Virginia state that the amendment, confers by a positive immunity, or right, to exemption from unfriendly legislation; exemption from discriminations, imposed by public authority, which imply legal inferiority in civil society, lessen the security of their rights, and are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject race; which has been my experience as an African American living in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
The documents for number 3 [Community Service Work Program (Form)(Library)] is a form that the local Winston-Salem Forsyth County Public Library tried to force on me as payment for library fines stating that is was volunteer work to eliminate the library fines. [Community Service is for offenders of the law-the library had no authority to offer/put such a program before me-only the courts could offer a Community Service Work Program for offenders of the law]-discrimination imposed by public authority-implies legal inferiority in civil society; lessens the security of individual rights and are steps towards reducing person to a condition of a subject race; and the discriminations imposed by public authority was the first.
Socialpeacest
They made the goal of my life: to exercise the equality of ALL the Civil Rights "that the superior race enjoy," and to have the protection of the general government, in the enjoyment of such rights, By the constant blocks and attacks of my civil right to pursue life, liberty and property by the constant intentional minipulation to ensure that the normal uninterrupted flow in the pursuit of life, liberty and property did not occure; because to allow all the civil rights "that the superior race enjoy" and protection of the general government in the enjoyment of such rights means that the person would be pursuing the natural heritage; And the twenty puls years of documention verify the lack of equality of all the civil rights of the superior race and the lack of protection of the enjoyment of those rights.
In the Strauder v West Virginia argument because I am an African American the general government should work harder to protect and to ensure that I have and enjoy all the Civil Rights of the superior race (not my words); and not be forced to give up the enjoyment of my civil rights (natural heritage) and that IF there are those who are opposing my enjoying my civil rights (natural heritage) or who have or are developing systems methods or ways to interfere with my enjoying my civil rights(natural heritage); then the general government should not impose discrimination on African Americans for their enjoying their civil rights; but the general government should protect the African American in the enjoyment of their civil rights; not force African Americans to assimiate into the civil rights of what the superior race(not my words)enjoys; nor should African Americans be punished for enjoying the civil rights (natural heritage); which is what the twenty plus years of document verifies; punishment for:exercising the equality of ALL the Civil Rights "that the superior race enjoy" meaning that I reconize and understand that there are traps
[discriminations, imposed by public authority, which imply legal inferiority in civil society, lessen the security of their rights, and are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject race.] And if that exists the person cannot [exercise the equality of ALL the Civil Rights "that the superior race enjoy"] because they are constantly fighting for the right to enjoy their natural heritage, which at least in Winston-Salem, North Carolina has been classified as - discriminations, imposed by public authority, which imply legal inferiority in civil society, lessen the security of their rights, and are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject race. ALTHOUGH in Winston-Salem an African American can JOIN the other race to avoid the punishment of being an African American.
The ORIGINAL goal was to obtain employment applied for in the city of birth; But,
discriminations, imposed by public authority, which imply legal inferiority in civil society, lessen the security of their rights, and are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject race have directed the goal to be - employment/income that eliminates being forced to do a job not identified on an application or something illegal or ilmoral. And that myself and family are not punished for not doing the job not identified on the application or yeilding to discriminations, imposed by public authority, which imply legal inferiority in civil society, lessen the security of their rights, and are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject race.
In Strauder v West Virginia it was argued and decided that people of color are to secure ALL CIVIL RIGHTS and PROTECTION of the general government in the enjoyment of such rights. The twenty plus years of documention are of the Civil Rights and Protection of those rights that have been denied and are not secure as they should be.
It stated in the "Strauder v West Virginia argument" that “the amendment not only gave citizenship and the privileges of citizenship to persons of color, but denied to any State the power to withhold from them the equal protection of the laws, and invested Congress with power, by appropriate legislation, to enforce its provisions.” One of the organizations (legal) tried to get me to sign a form about citizenship-whereas it states that the fourteenth amendment gave African Americans citizenship and the privileges of citizenship and denied to any State the power to withhold equal protection of the laws; BUT the twenty plus years of documentation are of those rights and privileges of citizenship; as well as equal protection of laws/etc. being denied/withheld.
The third point in Strauder v. West Virginia state that the amendment, confers by a positive immunity, or right, to exemption from unfriendly legislation; exemption from discriminations, imposed by public authority, which imply legal inferiority in civil society, lessen the security of their rights, and are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject race; which has been my experience as an African American living in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
The documents for number 3 [Community Service Work Program (Form)(Library)] is a form that the local Winston-Salem Forsyth County Public Library tried to force on me as payment for library fines stating that is was volunteer work to eliminate the library fines. [Community Service is for offenders of the law-the library had no authority to offer/put such a program before me-only the courts could offer a Community Service Work Program for offenders of the law]-discrimination imposed by public authority-implies legal inferiority in civil society; lessens the security of individual rights and are steps towards reducing person to a condition of a subject race; and the discriminations imposed by public authority was the first.
Socialpeacest
