Saturday, January 22, 2011
Can you make up your own laws as you go
Posed an article "Can you make up your laws as you Go; I keep dealing with people making up their own laws; I'm going to start making up my own laws!!!!!!!" on 10/19/10. It was about the library putting me in an offenders program instead of a volunteer program; which technically would start an offenders file; problem is no one could tell what offence I had committed; and there was no court hearing/date; which means that some type of law was broken; even though they communicated how LUCKY I was-meaning that sooner or later; IF you are African American and not working in ethnic intimidation/sooner or later you would be on the path that all African American's who don't obey are on; that of an OFFENDER; everybody who has their rights violated is offended and if they are constantly having their rights robbed, they are guaranteed to be offended and retaliate which is going to make them an OFFENDER; by reporting to MS. LUCKY volunteerily, you avoid the whole process; now aren't you lucky.
The article about "Can you make up your laws as you Go" was published on 10/19/10; then two to three months later-same situation-both times NOT given a reason for why I was put out of the library=witchcraft- and as the author of the book "The Everything guide to being a Para Legal' by Steven W, Schneider stated ;one of the issues to maintain a health society is stabiltiy of ESTABLISHED rules/laws; There are to be ESTABLISHED RULES OF CONDUCT so that a person will KNOW their rights, duties and privileges; which I can't know because they keep changing them on me whenever they want; I have been going to the library in Winston-Salem over twenty years with no conduct or behavior problems following the Library policy for library patrons; how am I suppose to know when they create a NEW rule?. In the book Mr. Schneider stated about the law?rules:
Law: ESTABLISHED rules of conduct:
1. KNOW your rights
2. Know what your duties are
3. What your privileges are
Laws are used to regulate and conform a person's conduct
Laws are sued to predict the consequence of a person's actions.
Laws are used to order your conduct accordinly; when 3 charateristic are present:
1. Stability
2. Predicitablity
and that is my problem; there is no Stability or Prdictability when I go to certain libraries; they make up thier own rules as they go; whatever they think they need to do to control=?; That's why I asked to know what I did was RUDE; because if I don't know I will do it again? And I told him that I have a letter from one of the security guards that has worked at the downtown library for over 22years and he stated that I was always doing research and was VERY COURTEOUS. The Problem seems to be that of forced assimilation; using ethnic intimidation to force a person to behave they want them to; with the goal of achieving what the head librarian did; instead of my doing volunteer work; switched it over to COMMUNITY SERVICE-designed for offenders-KEEP changing the RULES until as Mr. Schneider said under stability; For the law to be an effective guide to conduct, it must be stable. FREQUENT CHANGES(and that's what the library keeps doing) in goals in purposes of the law/rules breed UNCERTAINTY and make the law INEFFECTIVE as a guide to conduct-which is the libraries goal concerning myself to hinder research that they=? don't control because it verifies techniques/systems which violates a persons Constitutional Rights based on the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Laws are used to regulate and conform a person's conduct;Laws are sued to predict the consequence of a person's actions;Laws are used to order your conduct accordinly; but I can't do lthat if they keep changing the rules or using ethnic intimidation.
And the bible says to seek knowledge; the library is where the knowledge is; tried to have the internet at home; but A t & T wouldn't allow that they kept changing/blocking my telephone; thus as best I can write it everybody that has been identified on this blog; IF something happen to me can be charged; because they are assessories to fact in an uncurrupt legal system; but if the system is currupt they will find a way for each and every one of them to escape; but then they will have to deal with God; including the ones who put a grave site in the back of the Forsyth Tech Library /after/when they buried lady who bore me; may God do the same to each
of you and IF you did for good then why are you trying to intimidate and harass me?
Socialpeacest
The article "Can you make up your laws as you Go; I keep dealing with people making up their own laws; I'm going to start making up my own laws!!!!!!!" is as follows:
Following is a letter that will/has been mailed/emailed,etc. to the proper person concerning them putting off of the internet/computer/then them signing me up in an offenders program-because of my being lucky-don't have to go through the court process(because it is guaranteed that a person will be going through their system; if you are human you are going to get tired of the harassment and go off and then you will be charged; they know it is their system; so when they charge me; it will not be a surpise to them; because it is part of their technique to find the way to make people do something to bring a charge against them=???????????
Anyway for over five or more times have asked for something in writing concerning the federal law and the homemade local=?state=?law which was okayed by the city attorney; thus far; have not recieved a response=hummmmm; could it be because I am not considered to be a person and therefore they don't have to respond to my requests; hummmmm what could it be; maybe they are so sure of themselves that they KNOW how their people work, so it is just a matter of time before they will have to charge me anyway; their people are expert at the way they work; they are so good; they occupy the person's street in front of their house/to intimidate of coarse; they keep the person up under constant attack from/through neighbors, etc..
And today I met with an attorney who KNOWS all of the big people who have participated in abusing me:But they are still going to help me; aren't I a lucky person.
Wonder if I will get a response from them? about which law I should follow; if they have their way; it will be neither.
Socialpeacest
*************************************************************************************
10/19/10
To: -----a ------le
W------------m F------ County --- Street Public Library
W------------m, North Carolina 27---
RE: Correct Procedure
Federal vs State
After speaking with Ms. S----er about a month ago; she said that she would speak with you concerning the issue of the letter that was given to you at least a year ago; in which an inquiry was made as to the proper procedure concerning addressing the issue of being put off of the computers if a person has no money to pay fines. The federal law states that if any municipality receives money from the federal government then they cannot stop a person from using the equipment for which purpose that the federal money was given; in the W-------S---- F------ County Public Library situation; they received Federal money to help low income people to be connected to have more access to the computers; but that wasn’t the situation with me; it was the opposite;I was put off of the computers.
And as I stated to Ms. S----er; would greatly appreciate; someone putting it in writing; which law I am suppose to abide by; the federal law which states that no organization that receives money can stop a patron from access to the services for which the federal government was given to them or the law=?(state or local), which Ms. S----er said was created and okayed by the city attorney that it was okay to put people off of the internet or have their computer access blocked due to fines/money.
Which law is the correct law in case of future situations?
Thank You,
Socialpeacest
The article about "Can you make up your laws as you Go" was published on 10/19/10; then two to three months later-same situation-both times NOT given a reason for why I was put out of the library=witchcraft- and as the author of the book "The Everything guide to being a Para Legal' by Steven W, Schneider stated ;one of the issues to maintain a health society is stabiltiy of ESTABLISHED rules/laws; There are to be ESTABLISHED RULES OF CONDUCT so that a person will KNOW their rights, duties and privileges; which I can't know because they keep changing them on me whenever they want; I have been going to the library in Winston-Salem over twenty years with no conduct or behavior problems following the Library policy for library patrons; how am I suppose to know when they create a NEW rule?. In the book Mr. Schneider stated about the law?rules:
Law: ESTABLISHED rules of conduct:
1. KNOW your rights
2. Know what your duties are
3. What your privileges are
Laws are used to regulate and conform a person's conduct
Laws are sued to predict the consequence of a person's actions.
Laws are used to order your conduct accordinly; when 3 charateristic are present:
1. Stability
2. Predicitablity
and that is my problem; there is no Stability or Prdictability when I go to certain libraries; they make up thier own rules as they go; whatever they think they need to do to control=?; That's why I asked to know what I did was RUDE; because if I don't know I will do it again? And I told him that I have a letter from one of the security guards that has worked at the downtown library for over 22years and he stated that I was always doing research and was VERY COURTEOUS. The Problem seems to be that of forced assimilation; using ethnic intimidation to force a person to behave they want them to; with the goal of achieving what the head librarian did; instead of my doing volunteer work; switched it over to COMMUNITY SERVICE-designed for offenders-KEEP changing the RULES until as Mr. Schneider said under stability; For the law to be an effective guide to conduct, it must be stable. FREQUENT CHANGES(and that's what the library keeps doing) in goals in purposes of the law/rules breed UNCERTAINTY and make the law INEFFECTIVE as a guide to conduct-which is the libraries goal concerning myself to hinder research that they=? don't control because it verifies techniques/systems which violates a persons Constitutional Rights based on the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Laws are used to regulate and conform a person's conduct;Laws are sued to predict the consequence of a person's actions;Laws are used to order your conduct accordinly; but I can't do lthat if they keep changing the rules or using ethnic intimidation.
And the bible says to seek knowledge; the library is where the knowledge is; tried to have the internet at home; but A t & T wouldn't allow that they kept changing/blocking my telephone; thus as best I can write it everybody that has been identified on this blog; IF something happen to me can be charged; because they are assessories to fact in an uncurrupt legal system; but if the system is currupt they will find a way for each and every one of them to escape; but then they will have to deal with God; including the ones who put a grave site in the back of the Forsyth Tech Library /after/when they buried lady who bore me; may God do the same to each
of you and IF you did for good then why are you trying to intimidate and harass me?
Socialpeacest
The article "Can you make up your laws as you Go; I keep dealing with people making up their own laws; I'm going to start making up my own laws!!!!!!!" is as follows:
Following is a letter that will/has been mailed/emailed,etc. to the proper person concerning them putting off of the internet/computer/then them signing me up in an offenders program-because of my being lucky-don't have to go through the court process(because it is guaranteed that a person will be going through their system; if you are human you are going to get tired of the harassment and go off and then you will be charged; they know it is their system; so when they charge me; it will not be a surpise to them; because it is part of their technique to find the way to make people do something to bring a charge against them=???????????
Anyway for over five or more times have asked for something in writing concerning the federal law and the homemade local=?state=?law which was okayed by the city attorney; thus far; have not recieved a response=hummmmm; could it be because I am not considered to be a person and therefore they don't have to respond to my requests; hummmmm what could it be; maybe they are so sure of themselves that they KNOW how their people work, so it is just a matter of time before they will have to charge me anyway; their people are expert at the way they work; they are so good; they occupy the person's street in front of their house/to intimidate of coarse; they keep the person up under constant attack from/through neighbors, etc..
And today I met with an attorney who KNOWS all of the big people who have participated in abusing me:But they are still going to help me; aren't I a lucky person.
Wonder if I will get a response from them? about which law I should follow; if they have their way; it will be neither.
Socialpeacest
*************************************************************************************
10/19/10
To: -----a ------le
W------------m F------ County --- Street Public Library
W------------m, North Carolina 27---
RE: Correct Procedure
Federal vs State
After speaking with Ms. S----er about a month ago; she said that she would speak with you concerning the issue of the letter that was given to you at least a year ago; in which an inquiry was made as to the proper procedure concerning addressing the issue of being put off of the computers if a person has no money to pay fines. The federal law states that if any municipality receives money from the federal government then they cannot stop a person from using the equipment for which purpose that the federal money was given; in the W-------S---- F------ County Public Library situation; they received Federal money to help low income people to be connected to have more access to the computers; but that wasn’t the situation with me; it was the opposite;I was put off of the computers.
And as I stated to Ms. S----er; would greatly appreciate; someone putting it in writing; which law I am suppose to abide by; the federal law which states that no organization that receives money can stop a patron from access to the services for which the federal government was given to them or the law=?(state or local), which Ms. S----er said was created and okayed by the city attorney that it was okay to put people off of the internet or have their computer access blocked due to fines/money.
Which law is the correct law in case of future situations?
Thank You,
Socialpeacest
